# Counting Girls Out (Studies in Mathematics Education)

- On the Road to Sibiu.
- IOWME Publications | International Mathematical Union (IMU).
- Enfermedad Diverticular del Colon (Salud y Bienestar) (Spanish Edition)!
- User account menu!
- Della tirannide: Del principe e delle lettere - La virtù sconosciuta (Italian Edition).
- See a Problem?.

Changing perspectives, in K. The Victorian Certificate of Education-a gendered affair?

## Counting Girls Out - Valerie Walkerdine - Google Книги

Australian Educational Researcher, 28 2 , The effects of gender Geelong: Eds Gender and Mathematics Education: Ed Towards gender equity in mathematics education: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys London: Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the PhD. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 50 2: Graduate Women Choosing and Leaving Mathematics. Gender and Education , 16 3: Psychology's Response Washington DC: A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin , 2: Psychology of Women Quarterly , Van Bendegem and R.

Fischer Eds Math worlds: Eds Equity in Mathematics Education: Influences of Feminism and Culture London: A nontechnological learning environment where women count, in S. Rossen ed , Teaching the majority: Are they the way to the future? Kenway Eds , Gender matters in educational administration and policy London: British Educational Research Journal, 22 , Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning New York: A critical variable in mathematics education.

A gendered issue, in A. Laborde Eds , International handbook of mathematics education Dordrecht: International comparisons in mathematics education London: Increasing talent and gender diversity, in A. The Institute of Public Administration.

- German Protestantism and the Spirit of God. From Luther to Moltmann.
- Faith in the Fight: Religion and the American Soldier in the Great War.
- Complete Custom Closet: How to Make the Most of Every Space (Popular Woodworking)?

Implications for Mathematics Performance and Achievement, in L. The Challenge in Mathematics and Science Education: L and Jones, M. Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching , British Journal of Sociology of Education , 26 2: Journal for Research in Mathematic Education , 18 1: Issues in mathematics teaching.

Eds , Gender, Science and Mathematics: Shortening the Shadow Dordrecht: Millard Eds Gender in the secondary curriculum: Eds New directions for equity in mathematics education Cambridge: Journal for Research in Mathematic Education , 27 2: Support for the Differential Course-Taking Hypothesis. Journal for Research in Mathematic Education , 19 1: Hodgkinson eds Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes London: Feminist critical policy analysis: English and Mathematics London, UK: School Examinations and Assessment Council. How Equal Are the Opportunities?

British Educational Research Journal , 18 3: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 Van de gaer, E. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 32 5: God, physics, and the gender wars London: Gender and the construction of privilege Geelong, Victoria: The power of mathematics: Willis Eds Hearts and minds: From constructing privilege to deconstructing myths. From Enrichment to Transformation New York: Gender in early childhood education London: Collaborative learning in senior mathematics classrooms: Issues of gender and power in student-student interactions.

Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne. The book tackles issues and prejudice and examines and puts into perspective many claims that have been made about women's minds. It also probes the relationship between evidence and explanation: Paperback , pages. Published July 1st by Routledge first published May 1st To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Counting Girls Out , please sign up.

### THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS

Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. May 31, Trevor rated it it was amazing Shelves: This is an extremely interesting book, even if it does confirm my suspicion that I am condemned to be a structuralist and never quite make it across to the wondrous world of post-structuralism.

Why is it that girls are worse at mathematics than boys? The fascinating answer this book gives is that there is precious little evidence that girls actually are worse at mathematics, it is just that everyone is convinced they are and often despite very clear evidence to the contrary. Now, you might think This is an extremely interesting book, even if it does confirm my suspicion that I am condemned to be a structuralist and never quite make it across to the wondrous world of post-structuralism.

## A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

Now, you might think this would be an incredibly easy hypothesis to test — you know, maths is one of these things where there are right and wrong answers, not like, say, poetry where right and wrong can be harder to spot, and so, if you want to see how good someone is at maths all you need to do is give them a maths test. And if you want to see how good they are when compared to someone else or everyone else , well, give them all the same maths test and how well they do can be compared, on a graph if you like, or by some sort of statistical analysis showing how many standard deviations one person is over or under someone else.

Except, this is more or less what the research reported here did do. And the girls, more often than not, did at least as well as the boys.

And not just in primary school, but right through high school. When you ask their teachers about this you might think — given the objective measure provided by the test results — that they might say Jane is better at maths than Bob. But often they say the exact opposite. Jane has no natural flair and so only does well by the sheer force of her extreme efforts. This might sound like a kind of just-so story — except, time and again they found exactly this acted out in the classrooms, and this understanding of girls' apparent success and boys' apparent failure started insanely young.

This presents girls with a nearly insurmountable hurdle if they want to do maths. In post-structuralist terms, girls are denied a range of subject positions by the way that mathematical ability is defined as essentially male. One gets to choose to be either good at maths or good at being female - to be both is almost a contradiction in terms. It is not that teachers or students are actively seeking to exclude girls from mathematical knowledge, but that there are fundamental truths in our society that structure male power such that it is expressed via mathematical knowledge.

Our definitions of female: What I found particularly interesting was that the middle class girls here sought to remain little girls — as this, counter-intuitively, was a remarkably powerful location. This book ends in a way that might be unexpected. It sees mathematical knowledge as being fatally associated with male power structures and ways of knowing — ways that are about subduing nature, forcing it to our will and so on.

So, it isn't about finding ways of allowing girls to be better at maths - they are already good - but rather to find ways to make mathematics more in keeping with a better vision of the world. For example, I think the second last chapter of this book reports on some other research structuralist that was a content analysis of mathematics text books.

### Site switcher

The ones that had been used in primary schools had lots of women in them — admittedly, these women were frequently in fact, almost entirely in negative positions. Furthermore, by secondary school women have virtually disappeared entirely from these texts. But this book repeatedly makes the point that a structuralist understanding of this situation misses the point. But to me this is precisely what these books do. It is absolutely clear to me that the author disagrees, but my problem is in seeing why. View all 16 comments. Whitemanrm rated it really liked it Apr 08, Suzanne rated it really liked it Apr 21, Sarah added it Jun 11, Leni marked it as to-read Mar 12,