SOCIAL SECURITY: The Attempt To Kill It
MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY
The attacks on social security needed more time to stew in the echo chamber before they could be mainstream, and given the increase in lobbyists, they have risen dramatically. And they've diversified their donations to a slew of Republican opinion leaders — and strategic Democrats who oppose revenue increases like Senator Ben Nelson and Governor Andrew Cuomo. But traditional lobbying has now given way to the larger, more insidious propaganda campaign aimed at changing the terms of debate on social security.
The Koch brothers' echo chamber has successfully written the messaging for the AARP, a traditional defender of social security for all generations , which recently opened the door to cutting benefits. The authors of these hundreds of self-described policy studies, newsletters, commentaries and books are then paraded through television, print and online news media.https://sitechpharma.com/wp-includes/come-rintracciare-un-cellulare-con-google.php
Opinion: Why is GOP going after Social Security? - CNN
Their distorted message is amplified through shows like Hannity, on Fox News, with its 3. Gradually, influential opinion-formers in venerable news outlets will also react and have already begun to referee disputes on new "middle ground" that has, over time and through the actions of AARP and the Koch echo chamber, grown tolerant of the Koch brothers' talking points. Eventually, elected officials react to the Koch echo chamber and typically shift their position for reelection or the next campaign.
- History Textbooks and the Wars in Asia: Divided Memories (Routledge Contemporary Asia Series).
- Why is GOP going after Social Security?!
- Navigation menu.
- Cómo recuperar a tu hombre en tan sólo 7 días (Spanish Edition).
- An Irish country childhood remembered (Kerrie, my sheep-dog supreme)!
- Power, Pleasure, Poker and Pork Pies (The Manual 1) ((Mens Devotional)).
Influential opinion-formers in venerable news outlets will react and have already begun to referee disputes on new "middle ground" that has, over time and through the actions of AARP and the Koch echo chamber, grown tolerant of the Koch brothers' talking points. Most of us are too young to remember when growing old in America almost inevitably meant a miserable descent into poverty, but until the middle of the 20th century, that's what it was.
The current controversy revolves around a rule change Republicans made as soon as the new Congress was sworn in this month. The disability program will be facing a funding shortfall next year, and to ensure that disabled people continue to get all their benefits, Congress would have to move some money from OASI into DI. This isn't anything new -- it's been done many times in recent years.
The Koch brothers' campaign to kill social security
But House Republicans adopted a parliamentary rule barring the House from allowing that transfer unless it was accompanied by benefit cuts or tax increases. If it can't get worked out, people on DI could see their benefits cut substantially. The next generation and Social Security So why would Republicans insist on this? My guess is that they think forcing a mini-crisis over the Disability Insurance program's finances will allow for a debate on the program that will make it easier to do what they've wanted to do for a long time: The justification is always that the program is "going broke.
When people say that, what they're usually referring to is that, according to the projections in the Social Security Trustees' latest report, in the program's trust fund will be exhausted. But even if there are no changes between now and then, the program would not be "broke. Which would be awful.
That would be a large reduction in income for millions of seniors. The people who tell you that the program will be "broke" are hoping that, faced with that fictional nightmare, you might be willing to accept steep benefit cuts now.
The point is, it wouldn't be hard to come up with some combination of changes that could take care of the shortfall without cutting benefits. But for that to happen, both parties would have to agree on that goal.
AP fact check: Has Trump made Medicare and Social Security stronger?
And there's reason to wonder whether Republicans really want a Social Security that's strong and stable. Programs like Social Security and Medicare -- which provide vital benefits to millions of Americans and are hugely popular -- stand as a living rebuke to conservatives' small-government philosophy. When Republicans tell voters that government can't do anything right, they hope that the voters don't respond, "Well, the government is doing a good job keeping my grandma from having to eat cat food.